New Requirements Set for Journalists and Digital Content Producers in Cambodia.

Government Issues Proclamation on Professional Standards

On November 27, 2025, the Ministry of Information released a new proclamation outlining the qualification and professional requirements for individuals working in the fields of information and audiovisual communication. This announcement marks a significant step toward formalizing and improving professional standards within Cambodia’s media landscape. According to the proclamation, independent journalists, online content producers, and public personalities must now obtain a certificate of professional education in journalism and audiovisual studies. This certificate must be issued either by the Ministry of Information or by a training institution officially recognized by the Ministry. The move aims to ensure that all individuals producing public information meet a minimum standard of professional competence.

Elevating Media Quality and Public Information Safety

The Ministry emphasized that these measures are intended to build a more responsible and professional press environment. By establishing clear qualifications for practitioners, the government aims to strengthen journalistic discipline, enhance the credibility of information, and ensure greater public safety in the digital age. The proclamation stresses that the rapid growth of online media and social platforms makes it increasingly important to protect the public from misinformation, unethical reporting, and harmful content. In essence, the new regulations are designed to reinforce journalism as a respected profession and to promote higher-quality information for citizens.

Educational and Professional Criteria for Journalists

According to the Ministry of Information, individuals seeking to work professionally as journalists must meet several conditions. They must be at least 20 years old, hold a bachelor’s degree or an equivalent qualification, and possess a certificate of professional education in journalism and audiovisual studies granted or recognized by the Ministry. Beyond academic requirements, applicants must have completed at least one full year of experience as a reporter, evidenced by a recognition letter from the media organization where they previously worked or a valid employment contract. These criteria ensure that new journalists not only understand the theory of journalism but also demonstrate practical experience in the field.

Additional Requirements for Ethical and Professional Compliance

The proclamation adds further criteria to strengthen ethical standards within the profession. Applicants must have produced news articles for at least three recognized media organizations, proving a consistent track record of journalistic activity. They are also required to provide a residence and conduct letter from their local commune-sangkat along with an official health certificate. Importantly, applicants must have no prior record of publishing articles, videos, images, or content that violate the professional code of ethics, particularly regarding Cambodian culture, social standards, literature, or the Khmer language. This requirement underscores the Ministry’s intention to encourage responsible reporting and uphold national values.

Why Meta is scrubbing fake accounts — and what users in Cambodia should know.

In 2025 Meta (the company that owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp) intensified a months-long campaign to remove fake, impersonating and “spammy” accounts from its platforms. The push, part product integrity effort, part creator-experience reset, has seen Meta take down millions of profiles worldwide and roll out stricter rules and automated systems to detect unoriginal, misleading or abusive behavior. The policy changes and mass removals have created relief among creators who say their work is being stolen, frustration among ordinary users who suddenly found accounts disabled without clear explanations, and fresh scrutiny in countries where criminal scam networks have relied on social platforms to recruit victims or launder influence. Facebook

What Meta says it did (the big numbers)

Meta has published and repeated two related messages through 2025: one about “spammy” and “unoriginal” content, and another about impersonation and scam-linked accounts. In April and July 2025 the company said it was pursuing a “long-term initiative” to make Facebook Feed more relevant to real people and creators by penalizing accounts that repeatedly repost others’ content, engage in fake engagement, or impersonate creators. As part of that work, Meta reported that in the first half of 2025 it took action on roughly 500,000 accounts engaged in spammy or fake-engagement behavior and removed about 10 million profiles that impersonated large content producers. The company said these measures include demoting copycat posts, blocking monetization for offenders, and removing impersonator profiles. Facebook

Independent technology press picked up and summarized the same company figures and the new enforcement posture: Meta’s crackdown targets unoriginal, recycled and AI-assisted spam, with the stated goal of elevating authentic creators and making the platform less noisy. Reporting emphasized that many of the removals were automated and that Meta intends to continue similar actions over time. TechCrunch

Why Meta is doing this now?

Meta frames the campaign as both a product quality and a business problem. Duplicate and imposter content crowd out original creators, reduce users’ trust in what they see in the Feed, and make it harder for authentic accounts to grow. In addition, the company says impersonation and spam are often tools used by criminal scammers both to build credibility and to send victims toward off-platform scams. By taking down inauthentic or impersonating accounts, Meta says it can reduce the profit and reach of bad actors while restoring attention and monetization opportunities to legitimate creators. Facebook

The timing also coincides with a broader industry trend: platforms are facing pressure from governments, creators and advertisers to curb fraud, deepfakes, and large-scale content farms. New detection tools (including AI) make larger, automated sweeps possible — but they also increase the risk of false positives that can affect innocent users. Forbes

Countries and regions affected — and Cambodia’s place in the story

Meta’s published statistics are global and do not provide a public, country-by-country breakdown of disabled or removed Facebook profiles. That means the precise number of accounts disabled in any one country, including Cambodia is not released in Meta’s high-level posts. What reporting does show, however, is that Southeast Asia (and Cambodia in particular) has been a focal point of international concern because of organized “scam centers” that have embedded social media into their fraud operations.

Investigations and international reporting during 2024–2025 documented large scam networks operating from parts of Cambodia which used social platforms and messaging apps to run romance, investment and impersonation scams. Governments and international news outlets have linked some of the scams to account networks that were removed or disrupted by platforms and law enforcement. In August 2025, AP reported that WhatsApp had deactivated millions of accounts linked to criminal scam centers and explicitly mentioned that some of the schemes were traced to a scam center in Cambodia; that same reporting described how platforms work together to disrupt cross-platform fraud. More recently (October 2025) diplomatic and law-enforcement actions including joint sanctions and emergency diplomatic discussions — have highlighted Cambodia as a critical battleground in the fight against organized online fraud. AP News

In short: Meta’s global removals are measured in the millions, but public reporting does not supply a precise, official count for Cambodia alone. Where Cambodia becomes visible in the narrative is as a country where organized scam operations have relied on social platforms — prompting coordinated platform enforcement and government action. Facebook

How many Facebook accounts were disabled “lately”?

Meta’s public totals for 2025 are the best available benchmark: roughly 10 million impersonator profiles removed and around 500,000 accounts acted on for spammy or fake-engagement behavior during the first half of 2025, according to Meta’s own communications. News outlets and tech press repeated those global figures in July 2025 when Meta announced the expanded rules against unoriginal content. For WhatsApp specifically, Meta reported deactivating 6.8 million WhatsApp accounts linked to criminal scam centers during the first half of 2025. There is no official Meta breakdown showing how many of the disabled Facebook accounts were registered in Cambodia alone. Facebook

What happened in October 2025 (and why Cambodian users reported disabled accounts)

In October 2025 multiple international news stories and government statements focused on criminal networks and law-enforcement action in Cambodia, including arrests, diplomatic pressure from affected countries and financial sanctions on groups tied to mass online fraud. Those investigations and takedowns often coincided with platforms cutting off accounts, pages or messaging flows they identified as part of scam operations. As a result, many people connected to those operations (and, in some cases, ordinary users whose profiles matched the automated signals platforms used) found accounts disabled or blocked. Reporting shows that the October surge in attention to Cambodia’s scam centers led to a spike in combined platform and law-enforcement activity but again, platform statements give global numbers rather than a neat Cambodia count. Reuters

Real effects: legitimate users caught in automated sweeps

A consistent thread in reporting about the 2025 enforcement wave is that some legitimate users experienced disabled or restricted accounts after automated systems flagged their profiles for impersonation, unusual posting behavior, or connections to suspicious networks. Appeals and review processes exist, but users and commentators have reported slow or opaque outcomes in some cases. Meta acknowledges both the need for automation to scale enforcement and the risk of false positives; it says it is improving review processes and monitoring outcomes. Facebook

How to protect yourself from having your account disabled (practical steps)

Meta and security experts offer several concrete steps to reduce the risk of account takeover, impersonation or being flagged during an automated sweep. These are practical, actionable measures any Facebook user can do today:

1. Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) or passkeys. Add an extra layer beyond your password — an authenticator app, SMS code (less secure), security key (hardware), or passkeys where supported. Meta’s help pages explain how to enable 2FA and note that passkeys and security keys are becoming available as anti-phishing protections.
2. Verify your primary contact info and secure your email. Make sure your account uses an up-to-date, secure email address and phone number so Meta can contact you about suspicious activity and you can recover access quickly. Keep the email account secured with its own 2FA.
3. Avoid repeat reposting of others’ content without context. Meta’s new rules punish accounts that repeatedly share “unoriginal” content without meaningful edits or commentary — this is a signal that can hurt reach and monetization or trigger enforcement. If you repost, add commentary or a clear transformation.
4. Use strong, unique passwords and a password manager. Do not reuse passwords across sites; use a password manager to generate and store complex credentials.
5. Be careful with third-party apps and login permissions. Revoke suspicious app access and avoid logging in through unknown services. Third-party apps are a common vector for account compromise.
6. Monitor for impersonation and report it quickly. If you find a fake account pretending to be you, report it to Meta and ask friends to report it as well — coordinated reporting helps removal. Meta provides reporting flows for impersonation.
7. Keep a copy of important content off-platform. Regularly download and back up photos and messages you value. If an account is disabled permanently you’ll lose access to on-platform content.
8. If your account is disabled, use Meta’s official appeal forms and follow guidance closely. Meta’s Help Center explains how to appeal a disabled account and what documentation may be required. Appeals can take time; providing clear, correct identity documentation (when asked) helps.

Meta’s campaign to purge fake, duplicate and impersonator accounts is a global enforcement effort that accelerated through 2025. The company reports millions of removals at a global scale and says the work will continue. Cambodia has been part of the conversation because organized scam centers in the country were repeatedly named in cross-platform investigations and law-enforcement actions in 2025; those investigations contributed to intensified platform and government responses in October 2025. However, Meta’s public reporting does not publish a country-level tally of disabled Facebook accounts, so there is no official public figure that isolates “how many” were disabled in Cambodia alone. For ordinary users, best practice is to harden account security now (2FA/passkeys, unique strong passwords, verified contact info), avoid behaviors that mimic spammy networks, and be prepared to use Meta’s appeals flows if a legitimate account is mistakenly disabled.

A Digital Push from the Senate President

In Cambodia’s fast-changing digital world, where millions are connected through social media and mobile data, Senate President Hun Sen has once again made headlines not for politics, but for technology. Speaking at the closing ceremony of the extraordinary congress of the Cambodia Veteran Association (CVA), where he also serves as President, Hun Sen urged members to start embracing Telegram’s live-streaming feature. His message was simple yet powerful: Telegram Live is more efficient than Facebook Live, using less internet data and allowing more people, especially in rural areas, to connect and engage. This call reflects more than a preference for one app over another; it highlights a broader strategy for digital inclusivity, organizational outreach, and even business growth in Cambodia.

Why Telegram and Why Now?

Hun Sen pointed out that while Facebook has been the dominant platform for years, it comes with limitations. Broadcasting on Facebook Live consumes more internet data and requires stronger connections luxuries not always available to ordinary Cambodians. Telegram, on the other hand, offers live streaming with lower data requirements, making it easier for viewers in provinces and rural areas with weaker connectivity to participate.

For Hun Sen, this is not just a matter of convenience; it’s about access. If government institutions, associations like CVA, and even businesses want to reach people in every corner of the country, they must use platforms that are affordable and inclusive. By championing Telegram Live, Hun Sen is signaling that digital communication should be accessible to all citizens, not just those with high-speed internet or expensive data packages.

The Problem with CVA’s Online Presence

Hun Sen’s remarks also carried a dose of frustration. He noted that CVA’s presence online, especially on Facebook, was weak. Activities were rarely posted or promoted, and when they were, they didn’t capture much attention. To address this, Hun Sen created a special working group to collect and distribute updates from Bayon TV, his social media channels, and CVA events so that government activities could reach more people.

More importantly, he highlighted that many Telegram channel operators did not even know how to use the live-streaming function. This lack of digital literacy is a barrier not only for CVA but for countless other organizations across Cambodia. His message was clear: if you don’t know how to go live on Telegram, learn. For Hun Sen, failing to adapt to these tools is no longer acceptable in today’s connected society.

Falling Behind Means Losing Followers

Hun Sen also revealed a telling statistic about his own Telegram channel. Once boasting over one million subscribers, it has now dropped to around 700,000 because of passive performance and limited engagement. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Hun Manet’s channel continues to grow, currently with around 470,000 subscribers.

This shift demonstrates a universal truth of the digital age: audiences are not permanent. Whether you are a politician, an association, or a business, if you fail to engage your followers regularly with fresh and interactive content, they will leave. Telegram Live is therefore more than just a new feature it’s a tool to sustain attention, loyalty, and influence in a crowded digital environment.

Telegram Live: Features That Matter

Hun Sen’s recommendation is rooted in the advantages Telegram Live offers over competing platforms. Current features include:

• Low Data Consumption: Telegram requires less internet bandwidth than Facebook Live, making streams smoother even with weaker connections.
• Direct Broadcasting to Channels: Live streams can be broadcast directly to channel subscribers without relying on complex group structures or algorithm-driven feeds.
• Real-Time Audience Interaction: Viewers can send comments and reactions, creating a more interactive experience.
• Replay Options: Those who miss a broadcast can easily rewatch it later, extending the reach of the event.
• Event Scheduling: Channels can schedule live streams ahead of time, giving followers reminders and improving attendance.
• Audience Analytics: Basic data tools allow hosts to measure engagement and refine strategies.

These features make Telegram a practical choice for organizations and businesses that want affordable, reliable, and interactive communication with their audiences.

A New Trend in Data Consumption

Hun Sen’s promotion of Telegram Live also hints at broader economic consequences. If more people begin using Telegram instead of Facebook, data consumption patterns in Cambodia could shift dramatically. Telecom operators and internet service providers may need to adjust pricing models as users no longer require expensive data bundles just to watch live streams.

This change could reshape the digital economy, especially considering Cambodia already has around 11.65 million social media users about 68 percent of the population. If even a fraction of those users switch to Telegram for live streaming, the platform could become a significant player in the Cambodian digital space, creating ripple effects across business, government, and society.

Inclusivity: Reaching Every Corner of Cambodia

Socio-economic researcher Chey Tech described Hun Sen’s call as a “positive initiative” precisely because it benefits people in rural provinces. With Telegram Live, ordinary citizens can join digital conversations without paying high internet costs. For a country where many families must carefully manage mobile data, this is an important step toward inclusivity.

For the government, inclusivity translates into better transparency and public engagement. For businesses, it opens doors to previously unreachable customers. Whether it’s promoting a new product, hosting a customer Q&A, or delivering live tutorials, Telegram Live allows businesses to connect with consumers more effectively while breaking down the barriers linked to high data consumption.

Lessons for Business Owners

Hun Sen’s message should not be seen as relevant only for CVA or government institutions. Business owners in Cambodia can learn several critical lessons from this push toward Telegram:

1. Digital Literacy is Essential: Just as CVA operators struggled to use Telegram Live, many businesses risk falling behind if they do not invest in training staff to master digital tools.
2. Engagement is Key: Losing subscribers or customers due to inactivity or lack of fresh content is a risk every business faces. Consistency in communication keeps audiences loyal.
3. Platform Diversification Protects Reach: Depending solely on Facebook or TikTok is risky. Businesses should explore multiple platforms, including Telegram to avoid overreliance on a single channel.
4. Affordability Expands Markets: By using platforms that require less data, businesses can reach more customers, especially in rural areas where affordability is critical.
5. Interactive Features Build Trust: Real-time interaction during live streams allows businesses to build stronger relationships with consumers, enhancing brand credibility.

A Broader Vision for Cambodia’s Digital Future

Hun Sen’s call for Telegram Live should also be viewed as part of Cambodia’s broader journey toward digital modernization. The Senate President envisions a future where platforms like Telegram become hubs for government transparency, public engagement, and community building. For organizations like CVA, it’s a way to stay relevant; for businesses, it’s a way to grow; and for citizens, it’s a way to feel included in national conversations without facing digital exclusion.

This vision emphasizes that technology is not just about convenience but about empowerment. By urging Cambodians to embrace Telegram Live, Hun Sen is advocating for a more connected, inclusive, and innovative society.

The Opportunity of Telegram Live

Hun Sen’s advocacy for Telegram Live is more than a preference for one app it is a wake-up call. For CVA, it means modernizing communication to engage members effectively. For government agencies, it means reaching citizens with greater transparency and inclusivity. For business owners, it means recognizing new opportunities to connect with consumers affordably and interactively.

The future of digital engagement in Cambodia will not belong to those who cling to outdated habits but to those who adapt quickly, learn new tools, and diversify their platforms. Telegram Live, with its low data requirements, user-friendly features, and growing influence, represents an opportunity too valuable to ignore. Hun Sen’s words should be heard not just by CVA members but by anyone government, business, or individual who seeks to thrive in Cambodia’s fast-changing digital landscape.

6 Steps to Verify Whether News is True or Fake: A Guide Based on UNESCO Principles

In the age of digital media, where information spreads at the speed of a click, distinguishing between what’s true and what’s false has become more important than ever. From social media feeds to blog articles and even mainstream news outlets, misinformation and fake news have the power to influence public opinion, manipulate emotions, and, in some cases, cause real-world harm.

To combat this growing threat, UNESCO has outlined essential steps individuals can follow to verify the authenticity of the news. This blog post explores six practical and essential steps to help you become a more informed, critical, and responsible media consumer.

1. Check the Source

The first and most fundamental step in verifying whether news is true or fake is to check the source of the information. Always ask yourself: Where is this information coming from?

Legitimate news outlets typically have a well-established online presence and a history of credible reporting. If you see an article or post shared on social media, make sure the publication or website is trustworthy. Fake news is often spread through questionable blogs or imitation websites that look similar to real news outlets but are full of misleading or completely fabricated content.

Tips to verify a news source:

• Look at the URL – reputable news websites generally have clean domain names (.org, .com, .net) and do not include strange characters.
• Check the “About Us” section – does the site clearly identify its team, editorial standards, or ownership?
• Search the name of the outlet – has it been cited or criticized for spreading fake news before?
• Be cautious with satirical news – sometimes jokes or satire are mistaken for real news.

Remember, even if something looks professionally designed, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a reliable source of information.

2. Check the Date

Old news stories are often reshared or recycled on social media to give the impression of a current event. This tactic is used to stir emotion, fear, or anger based on past events, making readers believe it’s happening now. That’s why the date of the article or event is crucial in verifying its authenticity.

When you read a headline or post:

• Look at the publication date – is it current, or from months or years ago?
• Look at the timeline within the story – do the facts correspond to the date the article was supposedly published?
• Check if the same story has been recycled – sometimes fake news websites republish old stories with a new title or slightly edited content.

UNESCO emphasizes that time-stamping is an important transparency factor. By checking the date, you help put the content into the proper context, which is critical for accurate understanding.

3. Research the Writer

Not all journalists and content creators are held to the same standards of ethics and accuracy. A major part of assessing the truth of a news item is to research the author or writer. This is especially important for articles, opinion pieces, or investigative reports where the individual’s credibility plays a key role.

Questions to ask when researching the writer:

• Who is the author? Is their name mentioned clearly?
• What is their background? Do they have experience in journalism or a particular field?
• Have they written for reliable sources before?
• Can you find their professional profiles (LinkedIn, Twitter, news profiles)?

If a piece has no author name, that’s a red flag. Responsible journalism always includes transparency around the writer’s identity. If the writer is anonymous or untraceable, think twice before accepting the information as fact.

4. Verify with Other Sources

A hallmark of true information is that it can be verified through multiple reputable sources. If a story is true, chances are, other legitimate media outlets have reported on it. Fake news, on the other hand, tends to rely on isolation—spreading information that hasn’t been confirmed elsewhere.

To verify news with other sources:

• Search keywords from the article to see if it appears on other trusted platforms (e.g., BBC, Reuters, The Guardian, Al Jazeera).
• Use fact-checking websites like Snopes, PolitiFact, or AFP Fact Check.
• Cross-check quotes, events, or statistics to see if they are cited in multiple reports.

If no other reliable news source is reporting the same story, it’s likely to be fake or at least misleading. Cross-verification is one of the most powerful tools in fighting misinformation.

5. Mark Dates and Figures

Accurate reporting relies heavily on specific dates, numbers, and factual data. Misleading articles often use vague language or manipulate statistics to support a false narrative. That’s why it’s crucial to pay attention to dates, locations, figures, and names used in the news content.

Here’s how to approach this step:

• Highlight important facts and figures in the story.
• Double-check those numbers against official sources – government websites, official reports, and reputable databases.
• Watch out for manipulated data – sometimes statistics are taken out of context to promote a biased view.
• Pay attention to names and titles – are the individuals mentioned real? Are quotes attributed correctly?

For example, if a news piece claims “300,000 people attended a protest,” ask: According to whom? Is there evidence, footage, or confirmation from police or neutral observers? If the source of the numbers isn’t clear, treat the information with caution.

6. Analyze Meaning and Intent

Beyond checking facts, it’s equally important to evaluate the intent and meaning behind the message. Not all misinformation is entirely false – sometimes, it’s the way the story is framed that makes it deceptive. This step involves analyzing the tone, language, emotional appeal, and potential bias in the article.

Ask yourself:

• Is the article trying to make you angry, fearful, or outraged?
• Is the language sensationalized or overly dramatic?
• Does the story present both sides or only a one-sided viewpoint?
• Who benefits from this message being spread?

UNESCO advises that understanding intent helps audiences develop media literacy. News that is designed to manipulate emotions, create division, or influence political behavior should be questioned, even if it includes some factual elements. For instance, a photo might be real but used out of context to create a misleading narrative.

One way to practice this is to compare different news outlets reporting on the same issue. Look at how the headlines, images, and quotes differ. You’ll often spot the subtle ways that intent shapes how a story is told.

Final Thoughts: Think Before You Share

Misinformation can travel faster than the truth. Every time we share an unverified article or a sensational post, we risk contributing to the growing problem of fake news. But by applying these six steps—checking the source, date, author, cross-verifying, confirming data, and analyzing intent—you can become a digital defender of truth.

The internet has democratized information, but it has also opened the floodgates to manipulation and propaganda. That’s why UNESCO and other organizations continue to advocate for media literacy education worldwide. The goal is not just to stop fake news but to empower people with the skills to think critically and independently.

As you scroll through your feed today, take a few seconds to ask the right questions. Truth is not always easy to find, but with the right tools, it’s always worth the effort.

Have you ever encountered a piece of fake news that fooled you at first? What tools or methods do you use to verify information online? Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments below—we’d love to hear your tips on spotting fake news!