Low education, low development as the citizen’s income is low. Is there any correct answer to this question? ...Read more
Low education, low development as the citizen’s income is low. Is there any correct answer to this question?
Read lessLost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
You must login to ask a question.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Enhance your personal and professional growth with the Angkor Times’s Education Tips. Dive into blogs and updates focused on personal development, leadership skills, effective communication, and career advancement. Stay ahead in marketing, technology, and social media with expert insights and practical advice. Whether you’re looking to boost your skills or explore new opportunities, this category is your go-to resource for continuous learning and self-improvement.
A journalist asked me that in the past, both civil society organizations and some government officials have often disagreed on the standards of human rights practice in Cambodia. Article 31 of the Constitution, the Kingdom of Cambodia recognizes and respects human ...Read more
Article 31 of the Constitution, the Kingdom of Cambodia recognizes and respects human rights as enshrined in the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its conventions and conventions on human rights. Women’s rights and children’s rights. Therefore, execution contrary to this supreme law is not right.
Read lessWhen choosing an online platform or other technology for your courses, the selection process doesn’t have to be complicated. The same positive traits for fitness trackers can be reimagined for education. Consider the following six technology necessities during the decision-making ...Read more
When choosing an online platform or other technology for your courses, the selection process doesn’t have to be complicated. The same positive traits for fitness trackers can be reimagined for education. Consider the following six technology necessities during the decision-making process.
1. It Needs To Be Accessible Anywhere
Online textbooks have increasingly become the standard from secondary to higher education. School districts and universities alike provide students with tablets, laptops, and a capable wi-fi network. (Many students also have their own personal electronic device.) Logging into class online is quick and easy. Completing assignments or catching up on reading can be done on the go. Such functionality matches today’s students’ lifestyle which is essential to student success.
2. It Offers a Consistent Look and Feel
The look and feel of the online platform should be consistent across the board, no matter the electronic device. With the proper technology solution, students can access more than just pages of the text. The student experience becomes dynamic when homework assignments, study guides, concept summaries, reading quizzes, video tutorials, etc. are easy to find.
3. It’s Easy to Use
Once students log in to your online course, how do they access the resources? The course dashboard should be intuitive once students have logged on. Users should seamlessly move between assignments, course materials, and grade book hubs. Chances are if the online platform is cluttered, students will become discouraged, get frustrated, and log off.
The most frequently used hubs must be easily identified from the jump. This speeds up the learning curve for students. Informative, but straightforward assignment details should appear wherever a homework, quiz, or reading assignment is accessible to students. Gradebook features should include at-a-glance summaries. Students will properly budget their time once they identify the due date, point value, and topic of study for their assignments.
4. It Offers Data Feedback
Data feedback allows us to adjust in real-time. For student success, it’s essential to keep the feedback loop open whether inside or outside of the classroom. With the proper course management platform, this can be accomplished. Settings such as multiple attempts on problems, hints, links to the text, and right/wrong indicators can be manipulated by the instructor. Student time spent on a homework problem, the number of tries attempted, and access date for the assignment are all valuable metrics. Are these statistics available to the educator with the least amount of effort? A teacher needs to view these figures for their students, especially struggling ones, for intervention and remediation.
Feedback to the student verifies their level of understanding. It also redirects them to the proper path as they work through an assignment. Struggling students especially appreciate these features, in addition to having access to the answers and solutions at the teacher’s discretion.
5. It Saves Instructors Time
Creating online assignments should be quick and easy. Can you filter by chapter, section, and type of assignment with a few clicks? Students need access to course materials with the fewest number of steps. Can you rapidly distribute these items to your classes? Mind-numbing tasks like homework grading can be performed by your technology choice. These simple changes undoubtedly lighten your workload.
6. It’s Customizable
“One size fits all” typically devolves into one size fits none. Technology needs to have the capacity for customization by the instructor. He/She can then utilize the online platform to best suit the needs of the students- given the specifics of their own classes.
Instructors need autonomy to guide decision making. Which sections in the textbook need to be covered in detail, and which parts necessitate a quick run through? How are late policies treated? Should points be deducted across the board for overdue items? Are decisions made across the board, or do they vary section to section within the course? Each class section has individual demands that need to be addressed by the educator. Customization is key.
When you select technology for your classroom, how do you sift through your options? How do you identify the best choice for your students? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please leave a comment in the space below, and I will be sure to reply.
Read lessOnline education or eLearning is on the rise in Cambodia at these days and during Covid 19 pademic. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has forced physical classrooms worldwide to close; as a result, educational institutions across the world have had to adapt to ...Read more
Online education or eLearning is on the rise in Cambodia at these days and during Covid 19 pademic.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced physical classrooms worldwide to close; as a result, educational institutions across the world have had to adapt to e-learning (electronic learning) as an alternative to stay on track with their planned academic curriculum.
The closure of educational institutions as part of measures to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus has affected over 1.3 billion learners in nearly 185 countries (UNESCO, 2020). With the cancelling of traditional classrooms, remote or online learning via digital platforms supported by e-learning and videoconferencing software and applications has begun to increase significantly (Li & Lalani, 2020). The rise of online learning has led to a debate about the possibility of replacing the traditional classroom-based learning with online or e-learning (Lee, 2020).
Benefits of e-learning
E-learning or online learning is a new mode of learning enabled by digital devices such as laptops, tablets, or smartphones connected to the internet. In e-learning, students can virtually study from anywhere. During the COVID-19 pandemic, online classes conducted remotely are the only alternative available to continue education. In several ways, e-learning brings numerous benefits to both students and instructors.
Firstly, easy access to resources allows educators to upload study materials such as video lectures, slide presentations, textbooks, assignment instructions, and relevant course materials to their online classroom system. This can provide students with the opportunity to browse through the course content at their own pace and they can study anytime and from anywhere.
Secondly, online learning allows for greater flexibility. For example, courses on Coursera and edX do not require students to join lectures in the exact time set by their instructor or institution; they can, therefore, study whenever they have time. Thus, students will not miss the lessons even when they are busy with other tasks and commitments.
Thirdly, students and instructors can avoid a lengthy commute. Students do not have to go to their school or university anymore. They can stay at home and study without spending a cent on transportation, and they can be safe from the virus or other unpredictable incidents on the road.
Fourthly, students have the opportunity to ensure that they understand the lessons. In physical classrooms, especially in large classes, students who sit at the back or who take a nap during the class session might miss the important points in the lecture; however, in online classes, students can watch the recorded video lecture as many times as they wish until they can fully understand it.
Challenges of online learning
Online classrooms became the only option when schools were closed because of the pandemic. Online or e-learning via digital platforms came into existence and became a billion-dollar industry even before the pandemic. In 2015, as reported by Forbes, e-learning industry made up $107 billion and it was estimated that this business would triple to $325 billion by 2025 (McCue, 2018).
The advancement of technology is, however, not flawless. As it advances, it creates its own challenges. As the pandemic has forced students to study virtually, the issue of learning inefficiency (Nidheesh, 2020) and student dissatisfaction have arisen (Binkley, 2020). In what follows, I argue that e-learning will not replace the face-to-face classroom due to several reasons.
Online classes do not develop social skills
In online classes, students seem to engage less during lectures (Meyer, 2014). They are in front of their screens, talking to the devices, not to their friends nor their teacher as they do in physical classrooms. Besides, the quality of teaching in the face-to-face classrooms is arguably higher as the environment allows students and students or students and the instructor to interact with each other better, allowing them to work together to achieve the teaching and learning objective (see Kristiansen et al., 2019).
Without socialization students may not develop interpersonal skills. In traditional classrooms, students can do presentations or exchange ideas without any communication barriers. The learning experience in physical classrooms is unique and will never be replaced by other teaching styles. In face-to-face classes, teachers can use body language such as gestures to explain, facial expressions to express emotions, or action to demonstrate. Doing all of these in physical classrooms can attract students’ attention easily.
Ineffective class monitoring
In traditional classrooms, the instructor can easily keep students on their toes. For example, some students might look outside through the window, sleep or chat with their friends when they get bored or distracted. However, it will not take long for the instructor to draw students’ attention to reconcentrate on the lesson in physical classes. Unfortunately, in online classes, this might be harder.
In e-learning classes, students sit in front of their screens. However, not all students might focus on the lesson at hand. As research has shown, students were more likely to do multi-tasks such as being on social media, browsing the internet, and listening to music while learning online than when they study in in-person classes (Lepp et al., 2019). When there is no inspection from the instructor, students can do anything else besides focusing on the lecture in online classes. Unlike in traditional classrooms, I believe students can easily fall asleep, lose focus, zone out, or even leave the online classroom.
A study by Columbia University’s Community College Research Center found that the hurdles that online students face is the lack of personal individual engagement with their instructor (The New York Times Editorial, 2013). When lecturing in physical classrooms, teachers can directly give feedback to students, and students can ask their instructors questions straight away for clarification when they need. However, in online classrooms, it is different. Students may have to contact their instructor via message, email, or chat first. This means of communication might discourage them to ask questions.
There are other issues, including lack of engagement and interaction as well as feeling of estrangement. For example, it was found that students were more likely to fail or withdraw from the course than when they studied in face-to-face classes (The New York Times Editorial, 2013). A study by Martin and Bolliger (2018) showed that most college student believed that online courses were less effective than traditional classrooms. They also found that physical classes could increase student engagement, student satisfaction, and student motivation as well as reduce a sense of isolation among students.
Lack of access to digital devices and internet connections
Even though students commit to participating in online classes by trying to listen or take notes, they are still facing some problems stemming from the lack of digital devices or internet connection. I believe some devices, such as old phones, might be impractical as they can become hot and switch off by themselves while in the middle of the learning session. Students may face problems with their computers running on outdated operating systems that do not function effectively.
As reported in the Irish Times, when Irish students were asked about the reality of their virtual learning, poor internet connection was among other distracting factors during online classes (The Irish Times, 2020). This could deteriorate the quality of teaching and learning. No doubt, this kind of issue is more prevalent in developing countries in Asia and Africa that have low internet connection (Euro News, 2020).
In Southeast Asia, the term ‘digital divide’ has been used to illustrate the inequality of internet access in the region (ASEANPlus News, 2020). For example, there are only three countries such as Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia that have internet penetration of up to 80 percent of the population while other countries in the region have the internet penetration of around 60 percent or less (Jalli, 2020).
Poor course design and instructors’ digital literacy
There are problems related to course design and teachers’ digital literacy skills as well. For example, older teachers might find it hard to design a course that can be effectively delivered online. They may also find it challenging to engage students in online classes. No doubt, the success of online learning depends on a well-designed course, active discussion, and interaction between students and instructors (Swan et al., 2000). Thus, poor preparation or organization on how the course can be conducted will affect the quality of teaching.
Online class could cause health problems
With e-learning, students need to stay in front of the screen for long hours. According to Hand (2018), online learning can cause isolation, leading to anxiety and depression, while overusing computers can lead to negative physical effects such as muscle and joint injuries, increased mortality rate associated with excessive sitting, and eyestrain from computer use.
Conclusion
Online learning is a new adventure in education for students and instructors across the globe. It has a lot of benefits as we are living in this digital age. However, since the success of students’ learning depends on a well-designed course, accessibility, preparedness, and the instructors’ ability to engage students in their learning, the possibility of adapting fully to virtual classrooms becomes successful only when these conditions are met. Despite the rise of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is evidence of students’ dissatisfaction and learning ineffectiveness (see Dziuban et al., 2015).
Source: https://cefcambodia.com/2021/01/02/will-e-learning-replace-face-to-face-learning/
Read lessThe Current Labour Force in Cambodia Among ASEAN! Cambodia has emerged as the ASEAN leader in Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR), according to a recent report by the ASEAN Secretariat. This key economic indicator, which measures the proportion of a country’s ...Read more
The Current Labour Force in Cambodia Among ASEAN!
Cambodia has emerged as the ASEAN leader in Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR), according to a recent report by the ASEAN Secretariat. This key economic indicator, which measures the proportion of a country’s working-age population actively engaged in the labour market, underscores Cambodia’s strong workforce participation relative to its regional peers.
The latest data highlights Cambodia’s consistent performance in workforce participation, with an LFPR of 82.6% in 2014, rising to 83.7% in 2022. This surpasses other ASEAN nations, including Thailand and Vietnam, which reported high participation rates in 2014—70.3% and 77.5%, respectively—but saw notable declines by 2023 to 68.6% and 68.9%.
Other ASEAN nations have experienced mixed trends. While Indonesia and Malaysia improved their LFPR from 66.6% (2014) to 69.5% (2023) and 67.6% (2014) to 70% (2023), respectively, countries such as Brunei and Myanmar recorded declines. Brunei’s LFPR fell from 65.6% in 2014 to 63.6% in 2023, while Myanmar saw a sharper drop from 67% to 60.7% over the same period. The Philippines, after a decline in 2018, managed a recovery to 64.8% in 2023. Singapore and Laos showed gradual improvements, with Singapore rising from 67% in 2014 to 68.6% in 2023, while Laos, despite having the lowest participation rate, reached 47.1% in 2022.
The 2023 report also highlighted significant gender disparities in labour force participation across ASEAN. Myanmar recorded the largest gender gap, with 77.1% of men participating in the labour force compared to only 47% of women. Indonesia exhibited a similar trend, with male participation at 84.3% and female participation at just 54.5%.
Cambodia, however, reported one of the narrowest gender gaps, with male LFPR at 88.7% and female LFPR at 78.9%, reflecting a difference of only 9.8 percentage points. This places Cambodia among the top ASEAN nations in female workforce participation, alongside Vietnam (62.9%) and Singapore (62.6%). Conversely, Laos had the lowest male and female participation rates, at 52.6% and 41.9%, respectively.
Despite its high LFPR, Cambodia faces challenges in labour productivity. The Asian Development Bank (ADB), in its latest ‘Country Diagnostic Study’ (CDS), emphasized the need for strategic human capital investments to sustain economic growth and achieve upper-middle-income status by 2030. While Cambodia has made considerable progress in labour development, its productivity levels remain below other Southeast Asian manufacturing hubs.
To sustain its leadership in workforce participation and boost economic competitiveness, Cambodia must focus on enhancing skills development, improving education and vocational training, and fostering an environment conducive to higher wages and job security. Strengthening labour policies and attracting foreign investment in high-value industries will also be crucial in maintaining the Kingdom’s economic momentum.
Cambodia’s high Labour Force Participation Rate positions it as a regional leader in workforce engagement. However, to translate this strong participation into sustainable economic growth, the country must address labour productivity challenges through improved education, skills training, and economic diversification. As ASEAN economies continue to evolve, Cambodia has the opportunity to leverage its dynamic workforce to drive long-term prosperity.
Read less